Ophthalmology has two parallel exam code sets (E/M and 92xxx) and most practices pick wrong. We code the exam type that pays correctly and keep the surgical and imaging stack clean.
We see the same patterns across ophthalmology groups. The leaks are specific, recurring, and fixable with coding discipline and payer-aware claim construction.
Not a complete list. A representative slice of the codes that drive revenue and denials for ophthalmology practices.
| Code | Description | Profile |
|---|---|---|
| 92004 | New patient comprehensive ophthalmologic exam | High volume |
| 92014 | Established comprehensive ophthalmologic exam | Modifier-sensitive |
| 66984 | Cataract removal with IOL, standard | Denial-prone |
| 66982 | Cataract removal with IOL, complex | High volume |
| 92134 | OCT retina | Modifier-sensitive |
| 92133 | OCT optic nerve head | Denial-prone |
| 92250 | Fundus photography | High volume |
Exam code selected based on documentation (E/M vs 92xxx). Bilateral procedures billed per payer rule (RT LT separate lines or modifier 50). Vision plan and medical plan claims coordinated based on chief complaint.
Pattern we see. Exam type switching between 99xxx and 92xxx without documentation support, OCT medical necessity denials without specific diagnosis, and vision plan reject for medical coverage issue.
How we fix it. Every denial is logged against its CARC/RARC code and routed to a coder who owns the appeal. We rebuild the claim with the documentation the payer is actually asking for, not a generic reconsideration letter. Recovery rate on appealable ophthalmology denials averages above 60 percent.
A written 30-day diagnostic. Dollar figures against every finding. No obligation.