Podiatry runs into Medicare LCDs at every turn: routine foot care, nail debridement, orthotics. Documentation that matches the LCD gets paid. Documentation that does not gets denied. We write claims the LCDs accept.
We see the same patterns across podiatry groups. The leaks are specific, recurring, and fixable with coding discipline and payer-aware claim construction.
Not a complete list. A representative slice of the codes that drive revenue and denials for podiatry practices.
| Code | Description | Profile |
|---|---|---|
| 11720 | Nail debridement, 1 to 5 | High volume |
| 11721 | Nail debridement, 6 or more | Modifier-sensitive |
| 11055 | Paring of benign hyperkeratotic lesion, single | Denial-prone |
| 97597 | Debridement, open wound, first 20 sq cm | High volume |
| L3020 | Foot orthotic, custom | Modifier-sensitive |
| 28285 | Hammertoe correction | Denial-prone |
| 28296 | Bunion correction with sesamoidectomy | High volume |
Class findings documented (Q7, Q8, Q9) for Medicare routine foot care coverage. Diabetic foot care LCD compliance tracked (diagnosis plus systemic disease plus class finding). Orthotic custom vs OTS differentiation documented. Nail debridement frequency limits applied per payer.
Pattern we see. Routine foot care denied without class findings, nail debridement denied for frequency limits, and orthotics denied without custom fabrication documentation.
How we fix it. Every denial is logged against its CARC/RARC code and routed to a coder who owns the appeal. We rebuild the claim with the documentation the payer is actually asking for, not a generic reconsideration letter. Recovery rate on appealable podiatry denials averages above 60 percent.
A written 30-day diagnostic. Dollar figures against every finding. No obligation.